zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. chucka+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-04 15:20:04
The NSA is not going to tip its hand about any backdoors it had built into the hardware for something as small as this.
replies(1): >>ddtayl+o6
2. ddtayl+o6[view] [source] 2026-02-04 15:48:59
>>chucka+(OP)
It depends on if parallel reconstruction can be used to provide deniability.
replies(1): >>chucka+F8
◧◩
3. chucka+F8[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 15:59:49
>>ddtayl+o6
Even a parallel construction has limited uses, since you can't use the same excuse every time. The NSA probably doesn't trust the FBI to come up with something plausible.
replies(1): >>ddtayl+bi5
◧◩◪
4. ddtayl+bi5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-06 00:03:07
>>chucka+F8
That depends on how apathetic people are. Most of the time they will accept a completely garbage story and you can create infinitely many of those.
replies(1): >>chucka+997
◧◩◪◨
5. chucka+997[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-06 15:55:06
>>ddtayl+bi5
Sure, and that’s why juries buy the same line from cops every time, but major actors actually affected by potential backdoors are likely to be a bit more skeptical and start digging around for the real reasons.
[go to top]