zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. learin+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-04 07:52:38
Doesn’t that mean a home invader can break in, torture you a bit and walk off with your millions?
replies(1): >>duttis+x2
2. duttis+x2[view] [source] 2026-02-04 08:10:59
>>learin+(OP)
I think there was a rash of this kind of this kind of wrench cryptocurrency robberies in the Netherlands a few years ago.

Break in, bash owner about with a wrench, get coins. <Insert xkcd>

replies(3): >>aurare+S9 >>fragme+ui >>alcaza+5d1
◧◩
3. aurare+S9[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 09:07:36
>>duttis+x2
Yep, the meme in crypto community is that you can have all the digital security possible but it'll lose to the $5 wrench attack.
◧◩
4. fragme+ui[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 10:14:06
>>duttis+x2
xkcd 538, that is
◧◩
5. alcaza+5d1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 16:00:14
>>duttis+x2
This isn’t just a problem in the Netherlands or a thing of the past. 2025 actually saw the highest number of attacks ever recorded [0].

There are ways to prevent this. Like using multi-sig with geographical separation (so you can't move funds alone) or setting up forced time-delays. Ultimately, being your own bank is a massive responsibility, and I think too many people take that reality too lightly.

0: https://stats.glok.me/

[go to top]