zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. ushako+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:37:58
why? because there’s a huge market demand for Sandboxes. no one would be building this if no one would be buying.

disclaimer: i work at E2B

replies(1): >>ATechG+62
2. ATechG+62[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:47:59
>>ushako+(OP)
I'm not saying sandboxes are not needed, I'm saying VMs/containers already provide the core tech and it's easy to DIY a sandbox. Would love to understand what value E2B offers over VMs?
replies(2): >>ushako+74 >>kommun+Jh
◧◩
3. ushako+74[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 20:56:41
>>ATechG+62
we offer secure cloud VMs that scale up to 100k concurrent instances or more.

the value we sell with our cloud is scale, while our Sandboxes are a commodity that we have proudly open-sourced

replies(1): >>ATechG+l5
◧◩◪
4. ATechG+l5[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 21:03:21
>>ushako+74
> we offer secure cloud VMs that scale up to 100k concurrent instances or more.

High scalability and VM isolation is what the Cloud (GCP/AWS, that E2B runs on) offers.

◧◩
5. kommun+Jh[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 22:08:50
>>ATechG+62
making a local sandbox using docker is easy, but making them work at high volume and low latency is hard
replies(1): >>ATechG+wa1
◧◩◪
6. ATechG+wa1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 04:20:25
>>kommun+Jh
That's right. But they (E2B) rely on the underneath Cloud infra to achieve high scalability. Personally, I'm still not sure about the value they add on top of Cloud hosted VMs. GCP/AWS already offer huge discounts to startups, which should be enough for VM-based sandboxing of agents in the MVP phase.
[go to top]