zlacker

[parent] [thread] 17 comments
1. crazyg+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:04:00
What are you talking about? The article literally fully explains the rationale, as well as the history. It's not "denying" anything. Seems entirely reasonable and balanced to me.
replies(2): >>waffle+75 >>nixpul+L31
2. waffle+75[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:26:21
>>crazyg+(OP)
They are definitely denying the importance of 2-fold partitioning in computing architectures. VM_PAGE_SIZE is not defined with the value of '10000' for good reason (in many operating systems it is set to '16384').
replies(2): >>senfia+pb >>crazyg+ol
◧◩
3. senfia+pb[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 20:56:52
>>waffle+75
That's why I said "usually acceptable depending on the context". In spoken language I also don't like the awkward and unusual pronunciation of "kibi". But I'll still prefer to write in KiB, especially if I document something.

Also If you open major Linux distro task managers, you'll be surprised to see that they often show in decimal units when "i" is missing from the prefix. Many utilities often avoid the confusing prefixes "KB", "MB"... and use "KiB", "MiB"...

◧◩
4. crazyg+ol[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 21:49:25
>>waffle+75
No they're not? They very specifically address it.

Why do you keep insisting the author is denying something when the author clearly acknowledges every single thing you're complaining about?

replies(1): >>waffle+HT2
5. nixpul+L31[view] [source] 2026-02-04 02:13:42
>>crazyg+(OP)
Yea I don't understand the issue here. SI is pretty clear, and this post explains the other standard a little bit.

It's really not all that crazy of a situation. What bothers me is when some applications call KiB KB, because they are old or lazy.

replies(2): >>ZoomZo+P81 >>reaper+VU1
◧◩
6. ZoomZo+P81[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 02:54:12
>>nixpul+L31
...old lazy and wrong! Capital K is for Kelvin.
replies(1): >>schiff+db1
◧◩◪
7. schiff+db1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 03:16:05
>>ZoomZo+P81
>Capital K is for Kelvin.

It should be "kelvin" here. ;)

Unit names are always lower-case[1] (watt, joule, newton, pascal, hertz), except at the start of a sentence. When referring to the scientists the names are capitalized of course, and the unit symbols are also capitalized (W, J, N, Pa, Hz).

[1] SI Brochure, Section 5.3 "Unit Names" https://www.bipm.org/documents/20126/41483022/SI-Brochure-9-...

replies(2): >>fc417f+qg1 >>ZoomZo+ZS1
◧◩◪◨
8. fc417f+qg1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 04:06:57
>>schiff+db1
Thus there's no ambiguity. kB is power of 10 and KB is clearly not kelvin bytes therefore it's power of two. Doesn't quite fit the SI worldview but I don't see that as a problem.
replies(2): >>schiff+bE3 >>xigoi+db4
◧◩◪◨
9. ZoomZo+ZS1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 09:47:41
>>schiff+db1
I was pretty sure I'd be corrected in some manner, being two of the aforementioned three. Thanks.
◧◩
10. reaper+VU1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 10:03:50
>>nixpul+L31
because they are old

I keep using "K" for kilobyte because it makes the children angry since they lack the ability to judge meaning from context.

replies(1): >>nixpul+ou2
◧◩◪
11. nixpul+ou2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 14:15:21
>>reaper+VU1
You sly dog.
◧◩◪
12. waffle+HT2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 16:12:36
>>crazyg+ol
Denying the importance of...
replies(1): >>crazyg+fV2
◧◩◪◨
13. crazyg+fV2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 16:19:07
>>waffle+HT2
Which they're not...
replies(1): >>waffle+AE3
◧◩◪◨⬒
14. schiff+bE3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 19:32:36
>>fc417f+qg1
I often see it with "kB" too, so the proposed (ugly) hack doesn't really solve the problem.

I think the author had it just right. There's a lot of inertia, but the traditional way can cause confusion.

◧◩◪◨⬒
15. waffle+AE3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 19:34:31
>>crazyg+fV2
by coming to the conclusion they did, they are
replies(1): >>crazyg+Fq6
◧◩◪◨⬒
16. xigoi+db4[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 22:09:36
>>fc417f+qg1
This only works with kilobytes, not megabytes and gigabytes.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
17. crazyg+Fq6[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 16:08:59
>>waffle+AE3
So not denying. You just disagree is all.

So please don't mischaracterize articles in the future simply because you disagree with their conclusions. That's misrepresentation, and essentially straight-up lying.

replies(1): >>waffle+yW7
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
18. waffle+yW7[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-05 23:36:55
>>crazyg+Fq6
I deny your understanding of my use of the word deny :D
[go to top]