zlacker

[return to "1 kilobyte is precisely 1000 bytes?"]
1. waffle+pC[view] [source] 2026-02-03 19:24:06
>>surpri+(OP)
The author decidedly has expert syndrome -- they deny both the history and rational behind memory units nomenclature. Memory measurements evolved utilizing binary organizational patterns used in computing architectures. While a proud French pedant might agree with the decimal normalization of memory units discussed, it aligns more closely to the metric system, and it may have benefits for laypeople, it fails to account for how memory is partitioned in historic and modern computing.
◧◩
2. crazyg+nL[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:04:00
>>waffle+pC
What are you talking about? The article literally fully explains the rationale, as well as the history. It's not "denying" anything. Seems entirely reasonable and balanced to me.
◧◩◪
3. waffle+uQ[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:26:21
>>crazyg+nL
They are definitely denying the importance of 2-fold partitioning in computing architectures. VM_PAGE_SIZE is not defined with the value of '10000' for good reason (in many operating systems it is set to '16384').
◧◩◪◨
4. crazyg+L61[view] [source] 2026-02-03 21:49:25
>>waffle+uQ
No they're not? They very specifically address it.

Why do you keep insisting the author is denying something when the author clearly acknowledges every single thing you're complaining about?

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. waffle+4F3[view] [source] 2026-02-04 16:12:36
>>crazyg+L61
Denying the importance of...
[go to top]