zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. pdw+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 18:29:03
Even then it was not universal. For example, that Apple I ad that got posted a few days ago mentioned that "the system is expandable to 65K". https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/4/48/Apple_1_...
replies(2): >>wvenab+B9 >>kstrau+Yu
2. wvenab+B9[view] [source] 2026-02-03 19:04:54
>>pdw+(OP)
Seems like a typo given that the ad contains many mentions of K (8K, 32K) and they're all of the 1024 variety.
replies(1): >>duskwu+2b
◧◩
3. duskwu+2b[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 19:11:03
>>wvenab+B9
If you're using base 10, you can get "8K" and "32K" by dividing by 10 and rounding down. The 1024/1000 distinction only becomes significant at 65536.
replies(1): >>wvenab+gc
◧◩◪
4. wvenab+gc[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 19:16:10
>>duskwu+2b
Still the advertisement is filled with details like the number of chips, the number of pins, etc. If you're dealing with chips and pins, it's always going to base-2.
5. kstrau+Yu[view] [source] 2026-02-03 20:39:59
>>pdw+(OP)
Someone here the other day said that it could accept 64KB of RAM plus 1KB of ROM, for 65KB total memory.

I don't know if that's correct, but at least it'd explain the mismatch.

[go to top]