zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. accoun+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 12:04:12
I'm pretty sure that's intentional because the timestamp used to calculate where the article shows up on the front page.
replies(1): >>chrisj+86
2. chrisj+86[view] [source] 2026-02-03 12:42:23
>>accoun+(OP)
My greater faith in the integrity of the admins tells me they do not intend this false association. Its a misrep that can seriously mislead.
replies(1): >>efilif+ee1
◧◩
3. efilif+ee1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 18:06:44
>>chrisj+86
They intend it. It was explained by dang at some point
replies(1): >>chrisj+Rj1
◧◩◪
4. chrisj+Rj1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 18:27:14
>>efilif+ee1
I will look out for that.
[go to top]