zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. chrisj+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 11:10:23
... and the resurrection falsly associates the timestamp of the admin's action with the originator's posting. Needs attention.
replies(1): >>accoun+U7
2. accoun+U7[view] [source] 2026-02-03 12:04:12
>>chrisj+(OP)
I'm pretty sure that's intentional because the timestamp used to calculate where the article shows up on the front page.
replies(1): >>chrisj+2e
◧◩
3. chrisj+2e[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 12:42:23
>>accoun+U7
My greater faith in the integrity of the admins tells me they do not intend this false association. Its a misrep that can seriously mislead.
replies(1): >>efilif+8m1
◧◩◪
4. efilif+8m1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 18:06:44
>>chrisj+2e
They intend it. It was explained by dang at some point
replies(1): >>chrisj+Lr1
◧◩◪◨
5. chrisj+Lr1[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 18:27:14
>>efilif+8m1
I will look out for that.
[go to top]