zlacker
[parent]
[thread]
4 comments
1. chrisj+(OP)
[view]
[source]
2026-02-03 11:10:23
... and the resurrection falsly associates the timestamp of the admin's action with the originator's posting. Needs attention.
replies(1):
>>accoun+U7
◧
2. accoun+U7
[view]
[source]
2026-02-03 12:04:12
>>chrisj+(OP)
I'm pretty sure that's intentional because the timestamp used to calculate where the article shows up on the front page.
replies(1):
>>chrisj+2e
◧◩
3. chrisj+2e
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-03 12:42:23
>>accoun+U7
My greater faith in the integrity of the admins tells me they do not intend this false association. Its a misrep that can seriously mislead.
replies(1):
>>efilif+8m1
◧◩◪
4. efilif+8m1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-03 18:06:44
>>chrisj+2e
They intend it. It was explained by dang at some point
replies(1):
>>chrisj+Lr1
◧◩◪◨
5. chrisj+Lr1
[view]
[source]
[discussion]
2026-02-03 18:27:14
>>efilif+8m1
I will look out for that.
[go to top]