zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. golem1+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 07:16:41
Asking for a friend (who sucks at thermodynamics:) could you use a heat pump to cool down the cold end more and heat up the hot end much higher? Heat radiation works better the higher the temperature?
replies(1): >>typ+96
2. typ+96[view] [source] 2026-02-03 08:07:16
>>golem1+(OP)
Not sure about the effectiveness of a heat pump in this use case.

>Heat radiation works better the higher the temperature?

The power output is proportional to T^4 according to the Stefan-Boltzmann law.

replies(1): >>golem1+oA2
◧◩
3. golem1+oA2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 21:30:14
>>typ+96
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/10/4010

40% isn't much in the grand scheme of things, but maybe they can reach higher reduction with more research/materials. Mass and power are pretty cheap for spaceX, so shipping more solar panels and a heap pump might not be a deal breaker.

Would e.g. a reduction of 90% in radiator area change the overall picture on the overall feasibility? I think not, it would still be ludicrous, but I'd be happy to be proven wrong.

replies(1): >>typ+UT2
◧◩◪
4. typ+UT2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 23:14:50
>>golem1+oA2
The radiator area is probably not what they need to worry about that much as we thought. When the energy input comes from solar 100%, they just need to optimize the ratio of the sectional area facing the sun over the total surface area of the satellite. If the ratio is low enough, like a fin or cone shaped object, it will be harder to be hot.
[go to top]