zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. daniel+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 06:06:58
It doesn't. The person is saying they built just the functionality they needed. Probably 25% of a CMS. That's the point.
replies(1): >>Manuel+bb
2. Manuel+bb[view] [source] 2026-02-03 07:45:51
>>daniel+(OP)
Exactly.

And the big advantage for us is two things: Our content marketers now have a "Cursor-light" experience when creating landingpages, as this is a "text-to-landingpage" LLM-powered tool with a chat interface from their point of view; no fumbling around in the Webflow WYSIWYG interface anymore.

And from the software engineering department's point of view, the results of the work done by the content marketers are simply changes/PR in a git repository, which we can work on in the IDE of our choice — again, no fumbling around in the Webflow WYSIWYG interface anymore.

replies(1): >>daniel+W72
◧◩
3. daniel+W72[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 18:45:23
>>Manuel+bb
This is the benefit few understand properly. The storage layer is where you get a lot of benefits.
[go to top]