zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. iamacy+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-02 23:06:06
I’m not sure the world needed yet another CMS
replies(1): >>daniel+2X
2. daniel+2X[view] [source] 2026-02-03 06:06:58
>>iamacy+(OP)
It doesn't. The person is saying they built just the functionality they needed. Probably 25% of a CMS. That's the point.
replies(1): >>Manuel+d81
◧◩
3. Manuel+d81[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 07:45:51
>>daniel+2X
Exactly.

And the big advantage for us is two things: Our content marketers now have a "Cursor-light" experience when creating landingpages, as this is a "text-to-landingpage" LLM-powered tool with a chat interface from their point of view; no fumbling around in the Webflow WYSIWYG interface anymore.

And from the software engineering department's point of view, the results of the work done by the content marketers are simply changes/PR in a git repository, which we can work on in the IDE of our choice — again, no fumbling around in the Webflow WYSIWYG interface anymore.

replies(1): >>daniel+Y43
◧◩◪
4. daniel+Y43[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 18:45:23
>>Manuel+d81
This is the benefit few understand properly. The storage layer is where you get a lot of benefits.
[go to top]