zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. thegri+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-03 04:38:28
>> I know someone who avoids their local petrol station that is 10p/litre cheaper than most others nearby (within a mile or so) as they think the cheaper fuel must be lower quality

- "Top Tier gas contains higher detergent levels to prevent engine carbon"

- "Major brands use specific additives that enhance performance, while "no-name" or discount stations might only meet the minimum EPA-required detergent levels"

- "The condition of a station's underground storage tanks affects quality"

- "For the best engine performance and longevity, choosing Top Tier-certified gasoline is generally recommended."

replies(1): >>ace322+LG
2. ace322+LG[view] [source] 2026-02-03 10:40:11
>>thegri+(OP)
These things are not true in the UK - all fuel is held to the same high standard, though premium variants are available too.
replies(1): >>gib444+D11
◧◩
3. gib444+D11[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 13:09:17
>>ace322+LG
So no petrol is permitted to be higher quality (for the same octane rating)?

ie you're asserting there is zero variance in quality?

OP wrote lower quality, not low quality

replies(1): >>alexfo+Ug2
◧◩◪
4. alexfo+Ug2[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-03 18:45:22
>>gib444+D11
By "lower quality" I did mean "low quality".

It's the reverse of "this one is more expensive therefore it must be better" without any evidence at all that it is the case.

replies(1): >>gib444+6c6
◧◩◪◨
5. gib444+6c6[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-04 19:23:31
>>alexfo+Ug2
Yeah fair enough that's probably true

Companies are permitted to add additives etc but whether that meaningfully improves quality I'm not sure

[go to top]