zlacker

It’s a false sense of security, more or less. If an application wants to talk to a C2 they don’t have to make a connection at all, just proxy a connection through something already allowed, or tunnel through DNS. Those juicy cryptocurrency keys? Pop Safari with them in the URL and they’re sent to the malicious actor instantly. If you’re owned Little Snitch does nothing at all for you except give you the impression that you’re not.

>>drum55+(OP)
I find it difficult to believe that there is levels of cooperation between different companies that would allow this to work.

Source. I work for a company for longer than the internet has been alive.

>>worthl+X
My example is “living off the land”, safari already has access to everything, open it and use it to communicate. Needs no permissions, bypasses little snitch entirely.

>>drum55+61
Ah . I was thinking of non web apps.

>>drum55+(OP)
Especially in this case where the attackers could've proxied you to their malicious servers through npp's good/trusted servers

>>worthl+X
You have worked for the same company for >55 years? That's wild. Can you share the industry?

>>drum55+(OP)
That's at the very least harder and less likely; security is not all or nothing.

>>dfc+W5
IBM, although I consider internet and arpanet different things.

Like saying pstn and fiber are different things.

>>drum55+(OP)
This is far too cynical of a take. LittleSnitch might not save you from well-established malware on your machine, but it will certainly hamper attempts to get payloads and exploits on your machine in the first place