zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. bigyab+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-01 18:46:20
Not really. The Apple I was discontinued within a year of release, if you saved that money until 1978 then you could get an Apple II that would be supported for almost 20 years give-or-take.
replies(3): >>tracer+x >>chococ+i3 >>gignic+25
2. tracer+x[view] [source] 2026-02-01 18:50:16
>>bigyab+(OP)
But very really if you bought it and kept it until now.
3. chococ+i3[view] [source] 2026-02-01 19:11:55
>>bigyab+(OP)
Part of the reason the Apple I is so rare, is that Apple offered an Apple I trade in program. Apple would destroy the boards of Apple Is that were traded in for Apple IIs.

* Not that there was really many to begin with.

replies(1): >>biofox+S6
4. gignic+25[view] [source] 2026-02-01 19:27:05
>>bigyab+(OP)
Even better, what if I had invested that money in Apple stock instead? :)
replies(1): >>whartu+Sh
◧◩
5. biofox+S6[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 19:41:52
>>chococ+i3
What was the reasoning behind that?
replies(2): >>paulry+Hb >>Dwedit+2R
◧◩◪
6. paulry+Hb[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 20:18:57
>>biofox+S6
Probably to reduce support costs.

I recall my junior high school had only Apple IIs in 1995.

◧◩
7. whartu+Sh[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 21:11:17
>>gignic+25
I use to muse if I put the money I spent on computer gear back in the day instead into woodworking tools, I'd not only have a bigger, better shop than Norm Abrahm, all of the tools would probably still work.
◧◩◪
8. Dwedit+2R[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 02:04:55
>>biofox+S6
It's because the Apple I had no built-in BASIC, and booted to a Monitor prompt. It was hard to use without a manual in front of you.

Meanwhile, the Apple II just let you put in a disk and boot a program. Huge difference in usability.

[go to top]