zlacker

[parent] [thread] 16 comments
1. gignic+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-02-01 18:24:13
At $666.66 this must have been a diabolic deal!
replies(6): >>jagged+y2 >>bigyab+L2 >>Charle+u3 >>pixelp+E7 >>al_bor+qd >>seydor+Zj
2. jagged+y2[view] [source] 2026-02-01 18:44:24
>>gignic+(OP)
More devilish
replies(1): >>esafak+e6
3. bigyab+L2[view] [source] 2026-02-01 18:46:20
>>gignic+(OP)
Not really. The Apple I was discontinued within a year of release, if you saved that money until 1978 then you could get an Apple II that would be supported for almost 20 years give-or-take.
replies(3): >>tracer+i3 >>chococ+36 >>gignic+N7
◧◩
4. tracer+i3[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 18:50:16
>>bigyab+L2
But very really if you bought it and kept it until now.
5. Charle+u3[view] [source] 2026-02-01 18:51:38
>>gignic+(OP)
~$3,800 in 2026 dollars.
replies(1): >>chungy+T8
◧◩
6. chococ+36[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 19:11:55
>>bigyab+L2
Part of the reason the Apple I is so rare, is that Apple offered an Apple I trade in program. Apple would destroy the boards of Apple Is that were traded in for Apple IIs.

* Not that there was really many to begin with.

replies(1): >>biofox+D9
◧◩
7. esafak+e6[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 19:13:52
>>jagged+y2
Same thing.
8. pixelp+E7[view] [source] 2026-02-01 19:25:51
>>gignic+(OP)
Including 8K of "RAM memory", brought to you by the DRD Department!
◧◩
9. gignic+N7[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 19:27:05
>>bigyab+L2
Even better, what if I had invested that money in Apple stock instead? :)
replies(1): >>whartu+Dk
◧◩
10. chungy+T8[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 19:35:54
>>Charle+u3
Why, for $3800, you can now get a brand new Apple computer with a million times the RAM!
◧◩◪
11. biofox+D9[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 19:41:52
>>chococ+36
What was the reasoning behind that?
replies(2): >>paulry+se >>Dwedit+NT
12. al_bor+qd[view] [source] 2026-02-01 20:10:21
>>gignic+(OP)
This was because Woz liked repeating digits.

https://youtu.be/pJif4i9NRdI @2:05

◧◩◪◨
13. paulry+se[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 20:18:57
>>biofox+D9
Probably to reduce support costs.

I recall my junior high school had only Apple IIs in 1995.

14. seydor+Zj[view] [source] 2026-02-01 21:05:47
>>gignic+(OP)
It would be a cancellable offense today
replies(1): >>Andrex+wR
◧◩◪
15. whartu+Dk[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-01 21:11:17
>>gignic+N7
I use to muse if I put the money I spent on computer gear back in the day instead into woodworking tools, I'd not only have a bigger, better shop than Norm Abrahm, all of the tools would probably still work.
◧◩
16. Andrex+wR[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 01:45:50
>>seydor+Zj
From everything I've seen, I doubt it.
◧◩◪◨
17. Dwedit+NT[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-02-02 02:04:55
>>biofox+D9
It's because the Apple I had no built-in BASIC, and booted to a Monitor prompt. It was hard to use without a manual in front of you.

Meanwhile, the Apple II just let you put in a disk and boot a program. Huge difference in usability.

[go to top]