zlacker

Then maybe you should put that assumption to the test.

>>46762767

Is a pretty good comment, but it got flagged, there is a degree of unfairness here.

>>jacque+(OP)
I didn't flag it, but it's not an example of the kind of productive comment I was talking about either.

>>tptace+o
I recall us having a conversation about checks and balances long ago and you were pretty strongly trusting in those keeping the US safe in the longer term. I am quite curious what your expectations are for the mid-terms and the presidential election three years from now based on the recent past, are you willing to write about that?

>>jacque+b1
I don't understand what you're trying to do here but think at this point it'd be best if we just disengaged. Sorry, and thanks for understanding.