zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. tptace+(OP)[view] [source] 2026-01-26 21:00:29
I probably agree with like 90% of this but feel like if we actually tried to hash it out we'd get drowned out pretty quickly by vitriol.
replies(2): >>johnny+o6 >>jacque+07
2. johnny+o6[view] [source] 2026-01-26 21:32:10
>>tptace+(OP)
If that's the case, then I suppose this community is no different. And I don't like saying that because 1) I don't personally believe that and 2) it's against guidelines. But reality can be disappointing at times.
3. jacque+07[view] [source] 2026-01-26 21:35:16
>>tptace+(OP)
Then maybe you should put that assumption to the test.

>>46762767

Is a pretty good comment, but it got flagged, there is a degree of unfairness here.

replies(1): >>tptace+o7
◧◩
4. tptace+o7[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-26 21:37:11
>>jacque+07
I didn't flag it, but it's not an example of the kind of productive comment I was talking about either.
replies(1): >>jacque+b8
◧◩◪
5. jacque+b8[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-26 21:42:26
>>tptace+o7
I recall us having a conversation about checks and balances long ago and you were pretty strongly trusting in those keeping the US safe in the longer term. I am quite curious what your expectations are for the mid-terms and the presidential election three years from now based on the recent past, are you willing to write about that?
replies(1): >>tptace+o8
◧◩◪◨
6. tptace+o8[view] [source] [discussion] 2026-01-26 21:43:56
>>jacque+b8
I don't understand what you're trying to do here but think at this point it'd be best if we just disengaged. Sorry, and thanks for understanding.
[go to top]