zlacker

Had nothing to do with spam, the argument by archive.today that they needed EDNS client subnet info made no sense, they aren't anycasting with edge servers in every ISP PoP.

>>arcfou+(OP)
They use EDNS for regional compliance, not for bandwidth optimization.

>>venteg+m3
What specific part of regional compliance actually needs this, and why does no other website seem to need it?

>>joseph+1K1
e.g. currently most media snapshots contain wartime propaganda forbidden at least somewhere.

RT content verboten in Germany, DW content verboten in Russia, not to mention another dozen of hot spots.

"Other websites" are completely inaccessible in certain regions. The Archive has stuff from all of them, so there’s basically no place on Earth where it could work without tricks like the EDNS one.

>>venteg+sQ2
That makes zero sense. You're aware that they get the client's actual IP upon connection?

You're saying they have groups of servers with every possible permutation of censorship that they direct clients to through DNS? Absurd.

>>arcfou+uc3
They always direct clients to a server abroad. The task is exactly opposite to what CDNs do

>>venteg+sQ2
> The Archive has stuff from all of them, so there’s basically no place on Earth where it could work without tricks like the EDNS one.

Isn't that true of archive.org as well? Why doesn't it need EDNS then?

>>joseph+Y85
Actually, I'm not entirely sure on how archive.org achieves its resiliency.

It's a rather interesting question for archive.org, if one were to interview them, that is.

Unlike archive.today, they don't appear to have any issues with e.g. child pornography content, despite certainly hosting a hundred times more material.

They have some strong magic which makes the cheap tricks needless.