zlacker

You went on a bit of a rant there - lol. I like the new guidelines they explicitly disavow processed food. As for vaccines, not everyone complaining about specific vaccines is anti vax. A lot of vaccines are also region specific. Eg HK does TB vax for kids because Nannie’s from Indonesia carry TB. No one does the TB vax in the US.

A lot of vaccines are tailored towards the mother going back to work. They could be tailored for a later schedule if there is concern about secondary effects like autism and the child is being cared for at home.

Again I’m not anti vax but I also don’t think the protocol designers are providing alternative options which they should.

>>orochi+(OP)
> if there is concern about secondary effects like autism

It would sound more scientific and less anti-vaxxer if you said “concern about secondary effects like astrological contamination”

>>lazyas+K1
My kids are all vaccinated according to schedule. Calling me an anti vaxxer is cheap trolling.

And yes - if kids have had serious impacts to vaccines parents should be told and providers should encourage reporting into vaers

I put autism there because it’s the most commonly used anecdote when discussing this. I’m not saying take the vax away. Eg if mmrv is the big bad vax for autism - change its schedule to be given after 2 yrs after autism tests.

>>orochi+l5
Talking about "concern for secondary effects like autism" legitimizes the theory, whether you wanted to or not; that's why the person you responded to got annoyed.

>>satiri+Hq
It does not. And downvoting for being annoyed seems like a low bar. But people are just fucking hard to have a conversation these days.

On second thoughts I should have said “concern for alleged secondary effects”.

>>orochi+l5
I didn’t call you an anti-vaxxer and saying so is cheap trolling.