zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. tim333+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-24 23:35:34
There is competition. Basically everything you mention you can get from Microsoft instead for example.
replies(2): >>pixl97+Xc >>echelo+3B
2. pixl97+Xc[view] [source] 2025-12-25 01:32:23
>>tim333+(OP)
Microsoft... the convicted monopolist?
replies(1): >>Jensso+cn
◧◩
3. Jensso+cn[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-25 03:54:15
>>pixl97+Xc
Yeah, they are an alternative, so not a monopoly in this case.
4. echelo+3B[view] [source] 2025-12-25 07:21:12
>>tim333+(OP)
I'm glad 95% of URL bars don't just default to Google Search and immediately get hit by ad bidding war taxes. Would certainly suck if you had a well-recognized brand and just wanted your customers to access your website through the URL bar.

72% Chrome --> Google

15% Safari --> Google

5% Edge --> Bing

2% Firefox --> Google

2% Opera --> Google

...

This alone implies a divestiture of Chrome should be in the cards.

Or maybe Google would be so kind to remove queries with URL bar origination from ad sales if there's a registered trademark (within some edit distance) within the query?

[go to top]