zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. snowwr+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-23 15:39:42
For comparison, the Wall Street Journal does have a paywall but is not a banned site.
replies(2): >>metado+zj >>mrguyo+wr
2. metado+zj[view] [source] 2025-12-23 17:52:00
>>snowwr+(OP)
And 404 is also not banned, right?

As a noob here on HN, that's what I gathered from your previous comment:

> In the year since, a bunch of their original reporting has hit the front page

So, a year ago, before my time, 404 media was moderated in a way that seemed like a ban, but now it no longer appears to be shadowbanned, is that what I'm learning?

replies(1): >>tastyf+CI1
3. mrguyo+wr[view] [source] 2025-12-23 18:34:24
>>snowwr+(OP)
Don't forget that complaining about paywalls is actually against the rules. So how did the site get that ban in the first place?
◧◩
4. tastyf+CI1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-24 05:34:46
>>metado+zj
If a 404media article makes it to the front page, it's because enough people happened to vouch a [dead] article, which is quite unusual and involves a lot of luck (since most people don't have showdead enabled). Nothing has changed on the mod side as far as I'm aware.
[go to top]