zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. abraha+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-23 14:44:41
Just to clarify for anyone reading. 404 does not have a paywall. They have an account wall. Some articles require you to be signed into a free account to read.
replies(1): >>snowwr+b8
2. snowwr+b8[view] [source] 2025-12-23 15:39:42
>>abraha+(OP)
For comparison, the Wall Street Journal does have a paywall but is not a banned site.
replies(2): >>metado+Kr >>mrguyo+Hz
◧◩
3. metado+Kr[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-23 17:52:00
>>snowwr+b8
And 404 is also not banned, right?

As a noob here on HN, that's what I gathered from your previous comment:

> In the year since, a bunch of their original reporting has hit the front page

So, a year ago, before my time, 404 media was moderated in a way that seemed like a ban, but now it no longer appears to be shadowbanned, is that what I'm learning?

replies(1): >>tastyf+NQ1
◧◩
4. mrguyo+Hz[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-23 18:34:24
>>snowwr+b8
Don't forget that complaining about paywalls is actually against the rules. So how did the site get that ban in the first place?
◧◩◪
5. tastyf+NQ1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-24 05:34:46
>>metado+Kr
If a 404media article makes it to the front page, it's because enough people happened to vouch a [dead] article, which is quite unusual and involves a lot of luck (since most people don't have showdead enabled). Nothing has changed on the mod side as far as I'm aware.
[go to top]