zlacker

[parent] [thread] 12 comments
1. tempes+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-12-13 18:11:04
As a mostly back end dev Elm looked really nice but all the conflict with the creator and then the lack of compiler releases made me shy away a bit.

I have bumped into "the Elm architecture" in other projects though and it was nice.

replies(5): >>stylus+l3 >>rapind+Q6 >>scuff3+p7 >>aryono+GF >>tasuki+Lf1
2. stylus+l3[view] [source] 2025-12-13 18:34:39
>>tempes+(OP)
Which conflicts? Gleam seems to be released often?
replies(1): >>Otomot+C4
◧◩
3. Otomot+C4[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-13 18:41:50
>>stylus+l3
The elm drama
4. rapind+Q6[view] [source] 2025-12-13 19:03:52
>>tempes+(OP)
> all the conflict with the creator

Just so no one misunderstands this. The creator (Evan) didn't get into, or start, any drama himself that I ever noticed. I'd argue he's a very chill and nice dude.

I've been on the edges of the community for probably a decade now (lurker), and all of the drama came from other people who simply didn't like the BDFL and slow releases strategy.

5. scuff3+p7[view] [source] 2025-12-13 19:08:41
>>tempes+(OP)
Yeah I'm not a front end dev but I do kind of keep track of what's going on in that space. From what I saw it seemed Elm was all but dead. Maybe that's not true, but that was the impression from the outside looking in.
replies(1): >>culi+Nj
◧◩
6. culi+Nj[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-13 20:39:28
>>scuff3+p7
https://iselmdead.info/

I can't believe this is still up tbh. And I can't believe there's still people defending Elm's lack of development

> It’s true that there hasn’t been a new release of the Elm compiler for some time. That’s on purpose: it’s essentially feature-complete.

Last talk I saw by Evan Czaplicki (from the 2025 Scala Days conf) he seemed to be working on some sort of database language https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OtN4iiFBsQ

replies(2): >>scuff3+GJ >>tasuki+Tf1
7. aryono+GF[view] [source] 2025-12-13 23:13:08
>>tempes+(OP)
Not many people use elm directly but it has influenced the design of so many frameworks and libraries.

Right now I’m toying with the idea of building a GNOME application in rust, and the framework I’m using is relm4 which provides elm like abstractions over gtk-rs.

Previously I’ve built web applications with F# and elmish, which again provides elm like abstractions for building F# applications.

replies(1): >>scuff3+OK
◧◩◪
8. scuff3+GJ[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-13 23:51:22
>>culi+Nj
I get the sentiment. He feels like everything he wants is there so it doesn't need much more development. But it still feels off.
◧◩
9. scuff3+OK[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-14 00:00:28
>>aryono+GF
The Roc programing language is being developed because Richard Feldman wanted an Elm like experience in more places then just the front end.
10. tasuki+Lf1[view] [source] 2025-12-14 07:28:57
>>tempes+(OP)
> the lack of compiler releases

I'm a backend dev mostly and use Elm for all my frontend needs. Yes there are some things compiler-side that could be improved, but basically it's fine.

I appreciate not having to keep up with new releases!

◧◩◪
11. tasuki+Tf1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-14 07:30:26
>>culi+Nj
> And I can't believe there's still people defending Elm's lack of development

Why? (I'm one such person defending Elm's lack of development)

replies(1): >>scuff3+C72
◧◩◪◨
12. scuff3+C72[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-14 17:15:33
>>tasuki+Tf1
From the outside the project honestly does look kind of dead, what's your take on the development and community?
replies(1): >>tasuki+aRc
◧◩◪◨⬒
13. tasuki+aRc[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-12-17 21:47:00
>>scuff3+C72
The project is kind of dead but the community is alive!
[go to top]