zlacker

[parent] [thread] 7 comments
1. iddan+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-11-28 08:54:14
Cool stuff. The readme is pretty lengthy so it was a little hard to identify what is the core problem this tool is aiming to solve and how is it tackling it differently than the present solutions.
replies(3): >>mimisc+P6 >>zaphir+u7 >>vdm+Fy
2. mimisc+P6[view] [source] 2025-11-28 10:11:54
>>iddan+(OP)
A classic issue of AI generated READMEs. Never to the point, always repetitive and verbose
replies(3): >>kiecke+J7 >>SwellJ+T7 >>cube22+08
3. zaphir+u7[view] [source] 2025-11-28 10:19:40
>>iddan+(OP)
This looks like a ticketing cli
replies(1): >>simonw+2d
◧◩
4. kiecke+J7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-28 10:24:48
>>mimisc+P6
And full of marketing hyperbole. When I have an AI produce a README I always have to ask it to tone it down and keep it factual.
◧◩
5. SwellJ+T7[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-28 10:27:44
>>mimisc+P6
I'm not saying it is or isn't written by an LLM, but, Yegge writes a lot and usually well. It somehow seems unlikely he'd outsource the front page to AI, even if he's a regular user of AI for coding and code docs.
◧◩
6. cube22+08[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-28 10:31:29
>>mimisc+P6
Funnily, AI already knows what stereotypical AI sounds like, so when I tell Claude to write a README but "make it not sounds like AI, no buzzwords, to the point, no repetition, but also don't overdo it, keep it natural" it does a very decent job.

Actually drastically improves any kind of writing by AI, even if just for my own consumption.

◧◩
7. simonw+2d[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-28 11:26:18
>>zaphir+u7
That's exactly what this is, but it's one that's designed with coding agents in mind as its principle users.
8. vdm+Fy[view] [source] 2025-11-28 14:37:14
>>iddan+(OP)
https://steve-yegge.medium.com/beads-best-practices-2db636b9...
[go to top]