zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. jacque+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-11-05 12:16:01
You may well be right. Or... maybe there was a non-stress related manufacturing issue with a turbine blade. Maybe it ingested a bird, maybe it sucked in some crap lying on the runway. Maybe there as an issue with a part that was replaced during the 2 hour service just prior to the flight. Maybe there was an error during that service, or a defect that was overlooked. And a million other possibilities.
replies(1): >>pixl97+Rr
2. pixl97+Rr[view] [source] 2025-11-05 15:19:01
>>jacque+(OP)
I mean, I don't think I've heard of a bird strike knocking the engine off a plane.
replies(1): >>jacque+tN
◧◩
3. jacque+tN[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-05 16:57:13
>>pixl97+Rr
Oh, interesting. They even made a movie.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Airways_Flight_1549

Once an engine breaks the question is whether or not it becomes unbalanced, that is one reason why they can become detached from the plane.

replies(2): >>kelnos+sn2 >>hshdhd+mQ2
◧◩◪
4. kelnos+sn2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-06 03:47:10
>>jacque+tN
The account on that page seems to indicate that the engines didn't detach as a result of the bird strike. One detached upon impact with the river, and the other was still attached.
◧◩◪
5. hshdhd+mQ2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-11-06 08:51:27
>>jacque+tN
Unexpected way to increase air safety:

> In an effort to prevent similar accidents, officials captured and exterminated 1,235 Canada geese at 17 locations across New York City in mid-2009 and coated 1,739 goose eggs with oil to smother the developing goslings.[71] As of 2017, 70,000 birds had been intentionally killed in New York City through programs instituted after the ditching.[72]

[go to top]