zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. ryanis+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-10-22 16:44:26
I'm inclined to think you're right, but I can't figure out one thing - the command module (apparently) in Apollo 13 got down to 38F without active heating. That's much colder than standard data centre rack temps.

In the example of a data centre, there would be considerably more heat generation than 3 astronauts, but, I would like to understand more. 38F is cold, so heat is clearly lost not as slowly as we might think.

replies(1): >>xnx+92
2. xnx+92[view] [source] 2025-10-22 16:52:33
>>ryanis+(OP)
The Apollo passive radiators can dissipate ~2500 Watts into space. With most systems shut down, only ~500 Watts was coming from the remaining systems and the astronauts bodies.
replies(1): >>ryanis+C3
◧◩
3. ryanis+C3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-22 16:58:33
>>xnx+92
Cool, thank you. So I read this as fundamentally, the heat they dissipated far exceeded the heat they produced. Do you mind opining on what similar figures would be with modest passive radiators and a typical data centre rack heat output?
replies(1): >>xnx+3f
◧◩◪
4. xnx+3f[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-22 17:51:39
>>ryanis+C3
No idea what the passive radiators might look like (50x the size of Apollo?), but an Nvidia GB300 NVL72 uses 120,000 watts.
[go to top]