zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. paulco+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-10-13 21:29:55
I should add that I don’t care at all about my data being sold (to the highest bidder or otherwise). I also have a personal policy of paying for subscriptions (ad-free when possible) when they’re available.

But if something changes and I have to switch then I have to switch.

Not worth worrying about today!

replies(1): >>bigfis+Kj
2. bigfis+Kj[view] [source] 2025-10-14 00:11:10
>>paulco+(OP)
Even if you pay for it, there's really nothing stopping closed source software from selling your data. Especially Saas offerings.
replies(1): >>paulco+zk
◧◩
3. paulco+zk[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-14 00:19:31
>>bigfis+Kj
Yes and I literally don’t care if they sell my data.
replies(1): >>fsflov+0d5
◧◩◪
4. fsflov+0d5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-15 14:53:54
>>paulco+zk
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nothing_to_hide_argument
replies(1): >>paulco+Px6
◧◩◪◨
5. paulco+Px6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-15 21:44:51
>>fsflov+0d5
It's not a logical fallacy if I believe it.
replies(1): >>fsflov+Fy6
◧◩◪◨⬒
6. fsflov+Fy6[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-15 21:52:00
>>paulco+Px6
It's not a fallacy. You just don't understand that it's not about you but about the society and democracy.
replies(1): >>paulco+65d
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
7. paulco+65d[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-10-18 00:48:25
>>fsflov+Fy6
Sorry you must’ve shared the wrong link. The one you did share has this as the first sentence:

> The nothing to hide argument is a logical fallacy

Let me know which link I should be looking at that isn’t a fallacy.

[go to top]