zlacker

[parent] [thread] 5 comments
1. Captai+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-30 15:08:24
> They pull out and have no UK assets to seize.

How do you expect the "pull out" to happen? They must have had a UK bank account or similar, whose transfers won't get approved as they're trying to escape from criminal prosecution. Or they'll work with the US to ensure responsible individuals are held responsible.

It isn't exactly the first time someone/something commits crime in a country then try to escape, there is lots of ways to work with others on this.

replies(3): >>holler+g4 >>chrisj+vH >>BeFlat+l54
2. holler+g4[view] [source] 2025-09-30 15:25:47
>>Captai+(OP)
>they'll work with the US to ensure responsible individuals are held responsible.

I heard here recently during a similar discussion (about 4chan and this same British watchdog agency) that the US does not allow extradition of its citizens for breaking non-US laws if the behavior is legal in the US.

3. chrisj+vH[view] [source] 2025-09-30 18:21:28
>>Captai+(OP)
> They must have had a UK bank account or similar

How so? None is needed to take revenue from UK-seen ads.

replies(1): >>baobun+DT
◧◩
4. baobun+DT[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 19:16:32
>>chrisj+vH
They had more business than that in the UK. UK advertisers as customers for example
replies(1): >>chrisj+961
◧◩◪
5. chrisj+961[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 20:18:34
>>baobun+DT
I do not see how having UK advertisers necessitates the publisher having a UK bank account.
6. BeFlat+l54[view] [source] 2025-10-01 19:30:33
>>Captai+(OP)
> Or they'll work with the US to ensure responsible individuals are held responsible.

May US voters put America First over international law.

[go to top]