zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. lentil+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-30 13:40:18
shouldn't it be the other way round? if the UK doesn't like something a non-UK company is doing it should be them that go through the trouble of blocking it.

If I have a website I'm pretty sure I'm bound to break some random country's law without knowing

Answering my own question, I guess it's exceptionalism of the powerful countries where they can just bully you into following their law

replies(2): >>physic+N1 >>consta+F8
2. physic+N1[view] [source] 2025-09-30 13:50:14
>>lentil+(OP)
> shouldn't it be the other way round? if the UK doesn't like something a non-UK company is doing it should be them that go through the trouble of blocking it.

They're clearly working up to this; it's what happened with Pirate Bay, etc.

replies(1): >>Root_D+FJ1
3. consta+F8[view] [source] 2025-09-30 14:22:42
>>lentil+(OP)
Why should they do anything when they can push the burden of compliance onto you?
◧◩
4. Root_D+FJ1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 22:26:09
>>physic+N1
They don't want (correctly) unfavorable comparisons to China's "Great Firewall" made, which most Western governments have lambasted in the past, so there's a PR/Politics side of it too.
[go to top]