zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. milton+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-30 13:33:59
*no enforcement any longer. Back when we had Lina Khan at the FTC, she would have enforced it. Now we have a scammer-in-chief only enforcing laws against his political opponents
replies(2): >>jrmg+t >>pavon+Vn
2. jrmg+t[view] [source] 2025-09-30 13:36:18
>>milton+(OP)
I agree the current administration is way worse than the previous one in almost every respect, but to argue that the previous one would’ve enforced this particular thing is obviously untrue.

The situation’s been like this for a few years now.

replies(1): >>milton+W3
◧◩
3. milton+W3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 13:55:53
>>jrmg+t
Not fake ads, but Biden's FTC did go after fake reviewers and fake reviews: https://www.reuters.com/business/retail-consumer/us-ftc-fina...

If she had had more time, I could see Khan going after fake ads as well. There's nothing to me that suggests that she was deliberately ignoring fraudulent ads when she was extremely pro-consumer in nearly every other policy.

replies(1): >>jrmg+0f
◧◩◪
4. jrmg+0f[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-30 14:49:22
>>milton+W3
Agreed - I think it’s lack of resources. Congress would need to act to fix this.
5. pavon+Vn[view] [source] 2025-09-30 15:24:50
>>milton+(OP)
She started enforcing it against the most egregious offenders, but for every enforcement action, there were thousands that went unpunished. The problem is that FTC proceedings are very process heavy by design, which is what you want in some cases, but doesn't scale to widespread scam. We need to be prosecuting hundreds of thousands these cases every year if we want to make a dent and turn things around to fraud being a rare exception rather than a normal business model.
[go to top]