zlacker

Was this one of the OK ones?

>>darker+(OP)
I'm not an American, I'm an Australian. Our gun deaths sit at 0.9 per 100000 people instead of 14 per 100000 and I approve of our gun laws. In that sense, I guess I'd say that roughly 6% of this gun death was okay.

In a broader sense, it is of course not okay to shoot someone, but that's taking the quote out of the context of gun control measures.

>>darker+(OP)
Is anyone on the right asking for stricter gun control laws as result? That should answer your gotcha question.

>>darker+(OP)
He means lets not disarm ourselves for evil. Not that evil is OK, but that some evil may occur due to not disarming.

I disagree with him on guns, but that is the point.

>>nailer+DP1
Evil is happening right now, the guns are freaking useless.

>>dazilc+931
yes, the DOJ

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/04/politics/transgender-firearms...

>>thranc+pi2
Yeah I don’t really get the 2A people who want guns to protect from a tyrannical government. To do that you’d need to make a whole lot of other things legal like tanks, anti aircraft missiles, artillery, etc, and allow civilian groups to get together and practice using those things for combat. Without that, the intent of the 2A has sailed long ago.

>>darker+(OP)
It isn't okay for anyone to die from gun violence, but if we're gonna have to expect people to be sacrificed on the altar of the gun nut lobby, then it makes the most sense that the gun nuts should be the ones to suffer the consequences of the policies they support. The tree of liberty and blood blah blah blah.