zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. fraggl+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-11 00:22:56
Could you please clarify your statement?
replies(1): >>ethbr1+j
2. ethbr1+j[view] [source] 2025-09-11 00:25:15
>>fraggl+(OP)
>> Attacks on free speech - like social media censorship or bans - makes democracy not possible.

GP stated this.

Parent replied with a list of scenarios where violence created progress, albeit none of which featured universal democracy before the violence.

IOW, they are loudly agreeing with each other.

replies(1): >>komali+i2
◧◩
3. komali+i2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-11 00:38:31
>>ethbr1+j
At least in the case of the USA, then, there's still no universal democracy. Corporations have far more powerful and influence, in basically every election you can only vote for a neoliberal, and plenty of people get disenfranchised.
replies(1): >>ethbr1+l3
◧◩◪
4. ethbr1+l3[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-11 00:45:03
>>komali+i2
It seems like bike-shedding to equate complete lack of franchise with vote dilution.

They are very different levels of democratic access.

[go to top]