zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. BlueTe+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-09-02 14:50:07
Luddism -- in this case going without a smartphone altogether -- is quickly becoming the most reasonable option.

You are also quite quick to dismiss cheques as someone that never even tried them...

replies(1): >>rollca+Uo1
2. rollca+Uo1[view] [source] 2025-09-02 21:24:24
>>BlueTe+(OP)
You don't solve "abusive technology" by getting rid of the technology, you solve it by addressing the abuse.
replies(1): >>BlueTe+zi2
◧◩
3. BlueTe+zi2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-03 06:10:53
>>rollca+Uo1
Why not ? Worked out fine for asbestos. Technics aren't neutral.
replies(1): >>rollca+nF2
◧◩◪
4. rollca+nF2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-09-03 10:20:12
>>BlueTe+zi2
Asbestos wasn't understood well at first, and its continued use was due to its utility. Practically all countries around the world have successfully regulated/banned it. Removing asbestos is when it becomes most dangerous.

Online banking is dead simple to secure: require a TOTP token. It's something you have (like a debit card) + something you know (PIN/password). The poison being introduced is through a third party, and entirely unrelated to the original function.

[go to top]