zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. wahnfr+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-28 03:44:31
That's what they said. You've rephrased it
replies(1): >>quantu+C1
◧
2. quantu+C1[view] [source] 2025-08-28 04:03:10
>>wahnfr+(OP)
They didn't simply rephrase it, they delved into it a bit.
replies(3): >>empiko+p5 >>almyk+Rl >>bathwa+Ne2
◧◩
3. empiko+p5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 04:48:49
>>quantu+C1
What a profound observation!
◧◩
4. almyk+Rl[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 07:39:23
>>quantu+C1
That's totally correct, nice catch!
◧◩
5. bathwa+Ne2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 20:35:28
>>quantu+C1
You're absolutely right!
[go to top]