zlacker

[parent] [thread] 6 comments
1. jowea+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-08-28 03:09:27
Dismissing individual cases of use of those words is probably wrong, but noticing an uptick in broad popularity is very relevant and clear evidence of LLMs influencing language.
replies(2): >>wahnfr+A3 >>lelant+nN
2. wahnfr+A3[view] [source] 2025-08-28 03:44:31
>>jowea+(OP)
That's what they said. You've rephrased it
replies(1): >>quantu+c5
◧◩
3. quantu+c5[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 04:03:10
>>wahnfr+A3
They didn't simply rephrase it, they delved into it a bit.
replies(3): >>empiko+Z8 >>almyk+rp >>bathwa+ni2
◧◩◪
4. empiko+Z8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 04:48:49
>>quantu+c5
What a profound observation!
◧◩◪
5. almyk+rp[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 07:39:23
>>quantu+c5
That's totally correct, nice catch!
6. lelant+nN[view] [source] 2025-08-28 11:45:54
>>jowea+(OP)
> Dismissing individual cases of use of those words is probably wrong, but noticing an uptick in broad popularity is very relevant and clear evidence of LLMs influencing language.

Can't it also be evidence that more and more writing is LLM generated?

◧◩◪
7. bathwa+ni2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-08-28 20:35:28
>>quantu+c5
You're absolutely right!
[go to top]