zlacker

You should be thankful for the AI “accusers”; most of us will just assume you used the slop machine and stop reading whatever you wrote without wasting our breath telling you about it.

>>rogerr+(OP)
> most of us will just assume you used the slop machine and stop reading whatever you wrote

From what I've seen, the people who jump to hasty conclusions about AI use mostly do it when they disagree with the content.

When the writing matches what they want to see, their AI detector sensitivity goes way down.

>>Aurorn+h
Wouldn't surprise me if that's true. I just treat any AI-smelling content as an information hazard that is _at best_ providing no useful entropy and stop reading it. Something about it is just so repulsive.

>>Aurorn+h
Yeah, that's human nature.

>>oasisa+M1
And was true before AI. The means have changed, not the built-in human bias.