zlacker

> Words including “surpass,” “boast,” “meticulous,” “strategically,” and “garner” have also seen considerable increases in usage since the release of ChatGPT.

Okay everybody, add these to your list of words you can't use to avoid the trigger-happy AI accusers.

>>Aurorn+(OP)
You should be thankful for the AI “accusers”; most of us will just assume you used the slop machine and stop reading whatever you wrote without wasting our breath telling you about it.

>>rogerr+l
> most of us will just assume you used the slop machine and stop reading whatever you wrote

From what I've seen, the people who jump to hasty conclusions about AI use mostly do it when they disagree with the content.

When the writing matches what they want to see, their AI detector sensitivity goes way down.

>>Aurorn+C
Wouldn't surprise me if that's true. I just treat any AI-smelling content as an information hazard that is _at best_ providing no useful entropy and stop reading it. Something about it is just so repulsive.

>>Aurorn+C
Yeah, that's human nature.

>>Aurorn+(OP)
Nope. These are all useful words. Anyone who thinks AI is needed to produce something with these words is probably not worth communicating with. I use the word “meticulous” all the time, and “strategically” is an extremely common word.

>>oasisa+72
And was true before AI. The means have changed, not the built-in human bias.

>>al_bor+c3
They were joking...