zlacker

It's a contrived example which I have never really experienced in my own code (and at this point, I've written a lot of it) or any of my team's code.

Go had some poor design features, many of which have now been fixed, some of which can't be fixed. It's fine to warn people about those. But inventing intentionally confusing examples and then complaining about them is pretty close to strawmanning.

>>gnfarg+(OP)
I believe you that you've never hit it, it's definitely not an everyday problem. But they didn't make it up, it does bite people from time to time.

It's sort of a known sharp edge that people occasionally cut themselves on. No language is perfect, but when people run into them they rightfully complain about it

>>gnfarg+(OP)
That's really my problem with these kind of critiques.

EVERY language has certain pitfalls like this. Back when I wrote PHP for 20+ years I had a Google doc full of every stupid PHP pitfall I came across.

And they were always almost a combination of something silly in the language, and horrible design by the developer, or trying to take a shortcut and losing the plot.

>>gnfarg+(OP)
> It's a contrived example which I have never really experienced in my own code (and at this point, I've written a lot of it) or any of my team's code.

It's confusing enough that it has an FAQ entry and that people tried to get it changed for Go 2. Evidently people are running in to this. (I for sure did)