zlacker

[parent] [thread] 2 comments
1. thinki+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-29 15:38:49
So because a kid could go stand outside a store and ask someone to get them porn, we should not allow kids outside. We should not give them the "keys" to go to the outside world.
replies(2): >>wizzwi+Fi >>exodus+Vz1
2. wizzwi+Fi[view] [source] 2025-07-29 17:12:33
>>thinki+(OP)
We should make spaces that are suitable for children (most of which should not be age-segregated spaces), we should tell them to stay in those spaces, and we should treat their en-masse disobedience as a policy failure.

Children are getting into debt on online gambling sites? Investigate. Suppose we find that half of children saw a betting ad and wanted to play, and a third just really like online poker: banning gambling ads and providing no-money online poker would be good interventions. "Remove computers from the public library" and "require ID verification to participate in pub bets" are not sensible interventions.

3. exodus+Vz1[view] [source] 2025-07-30 04:05:36
>>thinki+(OP)
> "...we should not allow kids outside"

That's not an equivalent analogy. Freedom of movement, to stand outside a store, is a human right. It is not the same as "freedom to lurk around online spaces on Mummy's laptop and Daddy's internet account."

[go to top]