zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. tkel+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-25 06:06:26
Work profiles are inferior to separate user profiles, which are built-in to GrapheneOS.

Also "private space" is now available with Android 15 and can provide the same separation within a single user profile.

replies(2): >>Unroas+L1 >>piaste+Se
2. Unroas+L1[view] [source] 2025-07-25 06:25:57
>>tkel+(OP)
Don't you have user profiles in Pixels? I can create another user an switch. Just not super convient. Work profiles are actually pretty good good... For work.
3. piaste+Se[view] [source] 2025-07-25 08:33:26
>>tkel+(OP)
> Work profiles are inferior to separate user profiles, which are built-in to GrapheneOS.

Different use cases. User profiles are only active when you manually switch to them, while work profiles are active _alongside_ your main profile.

So for untrusted apps that you only use occasionally and on-demand (like the myriads of travel / shopping / random services apps), user profiles are great. For apps that you want to keep in the background, such as the proprietary messaging apps that all your friends use, a work profile is much nicer.

replies(1): >>strcat+rp1
◧◩
4. strcat+rp1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-25 17:05:08
>>piaste+Se
Private Space is very similar to a user profile but nested inside of another user. GrapheneOS adds shared clipboard control for Private Space which was the main disadvantage compared to a secondary user.

GrapheneOS supports having a Private Space in secondary users instead of only a single one in Owner. Supporting multiple Private Spaces per user is a planned feature at which point work profiles will be fully obsolete. The remaining use case for work profiles is to have both a Private Space and work profile in the Owner user.

[go to top]