zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. bluefi+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-10 23:01:31
Personally I don't want poor-average developers to be more productive, I want them to be more expert
replies(2): >>Terr_+7f >>pdabba+dg
2. Terr_+7f[view] [source] 2025-07-11 01:36:02
>>bluefi+(OP)
"Compared to last quarter, we've shipped 40% more spaghetti-code!"
3. pdabba+dg[view] [source] 2025-07-11 01:48:27
>>bluefi+(OP)
Sure. But what would you suppose the ratio is between expert, average, and mediocre coders in the average organization? I think a small minority would be in the first category, and I don’t see a technology on the horizon that will change that except for LLMs, which seem like they could make mediocre coders both more productive and produce higher quality output.
replies(1): >>bluefi+kv
◧◩
4. bluefi+kv[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-11 05:14:47
>>pdabba+dg
They definitely aren't producing higher quality output imo, but definitely producing low quality output faster

That's not a tradeoff that I like

replies(1): >>pdabba+wB1
◧◩◪
5. pdabba+wB1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-07-11 14:54:38
>>bluefi+kv
That's the study I'm really interested in: does AI use improve the output of lower-skill developers (not experts). My intuitions point me in the opposite direction. I think AI would improve their work. But I'm not aware of any hard data that would help answer this question.
[go to top]