zlacker

[parent] [thread] 1 comments
1. yababa+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-07-03 22:31:59
everyone in this thread needs to read this paper: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.1145/3411497.3420225

Where’s Waldo as presented isn’t even a proof of knowledge

replies(1): >>edanm+Ux
2. edanm+Ux[view] [source] 2025-07-04 06:51:08
>>yababa+(OP)
I think the Where's Waldo example, while not technically zero knowledge, gives a pretty good intuition of the idea behind it.

It certainly gives a "layperson" example of being able to prove you know something without revealing it, which isn't the whole definition of ZK but is the idea driving it.

[go to top]