zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. malfis+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-26 22:22:45
You answered it yourself, a sun synchronous orbit negates the need for large battery systems.
replies(1): >>mook+16
2. mook+16[view] [source] 2025-06-26 23:25:45
>>malfis+(OP)
That would make communicating with bits on Earth kind of painful though; I suppose that would work for a server that serves other sun-synchronous objects, but that seems like a rather small market.
replies(2): >>malfis+D8 >>riknos+We
◧◩
3. malfis+D8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-26 23:51:43
>>mook+16
You can have sun synchronous around an earth orbit. L1 would do nicely
◧◩
4. riknos+We[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-27 01:16:05
>>mook+16
Maybe.

If starcloud integrated with something like starlink, using the laser inter satellite links to distribute ground comms across a network of satellites, then the datacenter maintaining a direct link to a base station is probably a non-issue for most purposes.

[go to top]