zlacker

If we had funded that as much as we're currently funding AI I think it would have been a plausible goal. Keep in mind we cut more than half of NASA's budget after we first landed.

>>Dylan1+(OP)
I disagree.

>>sudden+J
The gap between spending multiple days somewhere and spending months somewhere isn't that big.

It was only six years to go from the first multi-person spacecraft and first spacewalk to the first space station.

>>Dylan1+B4
>It was only six years to go from the first multi-person spacecraft and first spacewalk to the first space station.

Yeah that's my entire point, technological process doesn't have a constant rate of acceleration. Some advances are quickly made one after another and others lag and take a very long time.

>>sudden+S5
How long do you think it would have taken to get a permanent moon presence if we kept up Apollo level funding indefinitely with that as the main goal? And since I only said "plausible", let's go with 80th-90th percentile best case scenario.

Even if technological progress stopped we could have launched enough parts to assemble a colony structure.

>>Dylan1+R7
I'm not sure we would have one today. Maybe a token presence but definitely not the moon colony dreams of the 60s.

>>sudden+ma
A token colony is still a colony. If you meant a specific size I wish you had been more clear upfront.

>>Dylan1+La
A colony typically refers to a place where people permanently live and are colonising, e.g. setting up state structures, having children, etc.

>>sudden+Od
Which could be 20 permanent residents and 10 non-permanent slots. I don't think that requires too grand of a structure.

>>Dylan1+Es1
This is splitting hairs, but I was envisaging something more like the ISS but on the moon. A far cry from the 50s/60s dream of a grill and white picket fence on the moon.