zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. pvg+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-06-03 01:27:16
Right but just like most people were looking for a cheap shirt, pot or chair, most people are looking for 'cheaper way to make computers do what I want'. These changes didn't happen because people hated art or failed to inquire with weavers, potters and joiners.
replies(1): >>bradly+a3
2. bradly+a3[view] [source] 2025-06-03 01:57:14
>>pvg+(OP)
But woodworkers still woodwork just fine with mass production. Just there are mass produced things. And there are not. So then there can be mass-produced code and there can not be. The article feel all or none and I do not think that translate to woodworking or software.
replies(1): >>pvg+54
◧◩
3. pvg+54[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 02:08:50
>>bradly+a3
I don't think the article says that. People still write games for the NES in assembly but that's effectively unrelated to current software development practice.
replies(1): >>bradly+M01
◧◩◪
4. bradly+M01[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 12:22:25
>>pvg+54
Again, this comparison that professional woodworking is anything like NES game building is just so far from my experience. Cabinet makers (and to a less extent furniture makers) are numerous and very successful.

Mass production doesn't have to eliminate the alternative to exist. The same way fast-food and cheap groceries are not a threat to quality restaurants.

replies(1): >>pvg+Iv1
◧◩◪◨
5. pvg+Iv1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-06-03 15:31:08
>>bradly+M01
This 'only one can exist' is something you brought in, though. Neither the article nor I am saying that.
[go to top]