zlacker

[parent] [thread] 3 comments
1. appcyp+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-30 15:32:08
I don't understand what you mean? Can you clarify?
replies(1): >>tough+Z6
2. tough+Z6[view] [source] 2025-05-30 16:12:54
>>appcyp+(OP)
sorry i meant to ask simon directly if they require a non-docker solution

im working on a wrapper that lets you swap runtimes and my first implementation is mostly a wrapper around docker containers

planning to add firecracker next

will explore adding microsandbox too cool stuff!

replies(1): >>simonw+ap
◧◩
3. simonw+ap[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-30 18:27:56
>>tough+Z6
My ideal solution is non-Docker purely because I build software for other people to use. I don't want to have to tell my users "step 1: install Docker" if I can avoid it.
replies(1): >>tough+kx
◧◩◪
4. tough+kx[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-30 19:34:58
>>simonw+ap
that does make sense, sadly firecracker seems to be mostly relegated to linux for now so there's no good multi-arch story i'm aware of
[go to top]