zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. tough+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-30 15:23:01
would you be OK with a -hardened- with default profiles docker containers one?
replies(1): >>appcyp+l1
2. appcyp+l1[view] [source] 2025-05-30 15:32:08
>>tough+(OP)
I don't understand what you mean? Can you clarify?
replies(1): >>tough+k8
◧◩
3. tough+k8[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-30 16:12:54
>>appcyp+l1
sorry i meant to ask simon directly if they require a non-docker solution

im working on a wrapper that lets you swap runtimes and my first implementation is mostly a wrapper around docker containers

planning to add firecracker next

will explore adding microsandbox too cool stuff!

replies(1): >>simonw+vq
◧◩◪
4. simonw+vq[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-30 18:27:56
>>tough+k8
My ideal solution is non-Docker purely because I build software for other people to use. I don't want to have to tell my users "step 1: install Docker" if I can avoid it.
replies(1): >>tough+Fy
◧◩◪◨
5. tough+Fy[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-30 19:34:58
>>simonw+vq
that does make sense, sadly firecracker seems to be mostly relegated to linux for now so there's no good multi-arch story i'm aware of
[go to top]