zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. nradov+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-28 20:20:22
Yugoslavia also had severe political repression, with peace between the provinces only maintained by a (near) dictator with a cult of personality. Their economy and standard of living was mediocre at best, and only even possible within a limited geopolitical context where they sat between competing superpowers. It wouldn't be possible to create something like Yugoslavia today. Stupid to even try.
replies(1): >>saubei+GX
2. saubei+GX[view] [source] 2025-05-29 08:06:38
>>nradov+(OP)
I'd argue the repression of reactionaries was part of the secret sauce that made it work so well. We saw what happened when they were loosened in the 90s.
replies(2): >>nradov+qm1 >>nec4b+sI2
◧◩
3. nradov+qm1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-29 12:44:24
>>saubei+GX
Repression like that is never acceptable regardless of the reasons or results.
replies(1): >>saubei+4H1
◧◩◪
4. saubei+4H1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-29 15:05:13
>>nradov+qm1
I'd posit that the rise of the Nazis (which caused the rise of the SFR Yugoslavia as a resistance movement) taught us differently.

Karl Popper, himself an Austrian that saw the rise of the Nazis and had to live in exile as a result famously formulated it as the paradox of tolerance.

◧◩
5. nec4b+sI2[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-29 21:51:40
>>saubei+GX
Thank you comrade to alleviate us peasants of having to think too much on our own.
[go to top]