zlacker

[return to "The Who Cares Era"]
1. 0_____+U5[view] [source] 2025-05-28 13:44:58
>>NotInO+(OP)
I was just kvetching about this to my partner over breakfast. Not exactly, but a parallel observation, that a lot of people are just kind of shit at their jobs.

The utility tech who turned my tiny gas leak into a larger gas leak and left.

The buildings around me that take the better part of a decade to build (really? A parking garage takes six years?)

Cops who have decided it's their job to do as little as possible.

Where I live, it seems like half the streets don't have street signs (this isn't a backwater where you'd expect this, it's Boston).

I made acquaintance to a city worker who, to her non-professional friends, is very proud that she takes home a salary for about two hours of work per day following up with contractors, then heading to the gym and making social plans.

There's a culture of indifference, an embrace of mediocrity. I don't think it's new, but I do think perhaps AI has given the lazy and prideless an even lower energy route to... I'm not sure. What is the goal?

◧◩
2. sp0rk+ic[view] [source] 2025-05-28 14:28:05
>>0_____+U5
> There's a culture of indifference, an embrace of mediocrity. I don't think it's new, but I do think perhaps AI has given the lazy and prideless an even lower energy route to... I'm not sure. What is the goal?

I think pride in work has declined a lot (at least in the US) because so many large employers have shown that they aren't even willing to pretend to care about their employees. It's difficult to take pride in work done for an employee that you aren't proud of, or actively dislike.

◧◩◪
3. saubei+dm[view] [source] 2025-05-28 15:22:55
>>sp0rk+ic
The solution to this is worker's self-management, an economic model that was pioneered by Yugoslavia, but has mostly disappeared with its dismantlement.

Any company with more than five employees had to be run as a worker-run coop. The board and execs were elected by the workers. Companies still competed on the market.

This would solve for the problem of alienation while still having an environment of competition.

◧◩◪◨
4. Walter+Lm[view] [source] 2025-05-28 15:25:17
>>saubei+dm
Was Yugoslavia an economic powerhouse?
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. saubei+Hp[view] [source] 2025-05-28 15:40:47
>>Walter+Lm
It was a place where people lived good lives and had plenty of opportunities to succeed, along with free education and healthcare.

I'm kind of tired of being an economic powerhouse where most people live in misery.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. nradov+pd1[view] [source] 2025-05-28 20:20:22
>>saubei+Hp
Yugoslavia also had severe political repression, with peace between the provinces only maintained by a (near) dictator with a cult of personality. Their economy and standard of living was mediocre at best, and only even possible within a limited geopolitical context where they sat between competing superpowers. It wouldn't be possible to create something like Yugoslavia today. Stupid to even try.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. saubei+5b2[view] [source] 2025-05-29 08:06:38
>>nradov+pd1
I'd argue the repression of reactionaries was part of the secret sauce that made it work so well. We saw what happened when they were loosened in the 90s.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. nradov+Pz2[view] [source] 2025-05-29 12:44:24
>>saubei+5b2
Repression like that is never acceptable regardless of the reasons or results.
[go to top]