zlacker

[parent] [thread] 4 comments
1. fluidc+(OP)[view] [source] 2025-05-27 12:10:55
In the '00s triggered by a stock market tumble, GE declared MRI was mature technology, put its MR products into maintenance mode, gutted R&D, laid off their coil lab (which other manufacturers used to contract with), canceled all new product development, sent platform software to India, and got rid of the US development team. After the breakup, GE's been trying really hard to catch up (which is good!). They're leading on the new deep-learning recons due to ties with SV but all their kit is dated and old and built for a different era. Even now it's still just new lipstick on the old tech because it takes so long to get stuff out. The new software platform that doesn't suck has been in an eternal state of "real soon now". Having said that... my sense is that they seem genuinely hungry while their major competitor has become a bit too well-fed in GE's absence. I do really like the things GE has coming, they're... just not here yet.
replies(1): >>azalem+x4
2. azalem+x4[view] [source] 2025-05-27 12:47:52
>>fluidc+(OP)
I agree with you on all of this (and like the fact that GE uses linux as a base, and not, as Siemens and Philips do, Windows + cygwin + a separate box either running linux or vxWorks). I guess my point was I think it's interesting that GE's main competitors in the MRI space are...well, Siemens and Philips, both of whom independently have their historical origins in power engineering (and make gas turbines!). Both have been going for a long, long time from the early days of MRI. And if you look at CT as another example – well, that came out of BASF, another engineering conglomerate. Ultrasound, first proposed for medical use by the physicist Paul Langevin, found practical application much later, again under similar conditions.

I guess what I'm trying to say is: it's almost as if the combination of supporting physics and engineering without particular attention to the ultimate "core competency" or "end market segment" lets creative, interdisciplinary ideas like this flourish.

replies(1): >>fluidc+pd
◧◩
3. fluidc+pd[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-27 13:47:59
>>azalem+x4
iirc Siemens developed their own, but Philips MRI came via acquisition of Picker. Ultimately while there are some electronics and power similarities, I think the nature of healthcare products and services don't integrate well with management of the rest. MRI is just one part of the healthcare portfolio. Siemens has also spun off its healthcare business recently.
replies(1): >>azalem+vc1
◧◩◪
4. azalem+vc1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-27 21:20:07
>>fluidc+pd
I thought Philips also came about from SMIT and Marconi Medical Systems – could very well be wrong!
replies(1): >>fluidc+vg1
◧◩◪◨
5. fluidc+vg1[view] [source] [discussion] 2025-05-27 22:00:26
>>azalem+vc1
Marconi was a rebranding of Picker

https://case.edu/ech/articles/m/marconi-medical-systems-inc

[go to top]